How We Help Manufacturers Improve Performance
We deliver hands-on shopfloor engineering and structured operational changes to unlock hidden plant capacity, reduce lead times, and accelerate Operational Results.
Lean Manufacturing
Eliminate waste, streamline shopfloor operations, and instill continuous improvement discipline.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Manufacturing plants suffer from invisible shopfloor waste, excessive motion, overproduction, and defects that inflate operating costs and degrade productivity.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Conduct shopfloor diagnostic and 7 Waste (Muda) audit across value streams.
- 2Step 2: Implement 5S workplace organization and visual controls.
- 3Step 3: Map current state Value Streams and design future state target flows.
- 4Step 4: Train frontline operators and supervisors in Kaizen and structured problem-solving.
- 5Step 5: Establish Daily Management Systems (DMS) and standard work audits.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 25-40% reduction in non-value-adding activity time
- 30% improvement in shopfloor space utilization
- 20% decrease in operational defects and rework
Methodologies Used
Operational Excellence
Align management systems, culture, and processes for sustainable peak manufacturing performance.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Fragmented improvement initiatives often fail to sustain, resulting in inconsistent performance, lack of accountability, and disconnected KPIs across management tiers.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Perform comprehensive operational health check and leadership alignment.
- 2Step 2: Establish cascading visual KPI management systems from COO to shopfloor.
- 3Step 3: Define standardized management operating cadences and daily standups.
- 4Step 4: Deploy capability-building programs for plant managers and shift supervisors.
- 5Step 5: Implement governance models and sustaining audit mechanisms.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 15-30% plant-wide productivity enhancement
- Sustainable execution culture with high frontline accountability
- 95%+ adherence to operational target metrics
Methodologies Used
Industrial Engineering
Scientific time-and-motion analysis to optimize work content, ergonomics, and productivity.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Unmeasured work methods and subjective standard times lead to inaccurate labor costing, low worker productivity, and inefficient workstation design.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Execute detailed MOST (Maynard Operation Sequence Technique) or stop-watch time studies.
- 2Step 2: Analyze operator movements, ergonomics, and non-value-adding motion.
- 3Step 3: Redesign workstations and tool positioning for optimal human-machine synergy.
- 4Step 4: Establish standardized work instructions and cycle time baselines.
- 5Step 5: Roll out multi-skilling matrix and operator skill verification.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 20-35% improvement in labor productivity
- Accurate standard time baselines for precise scheduling
- Ergonomics improvement reducing fatigue and injuries
Methodologies Used
Factory Layout Optimisation
Design lean, continuous-flow plant layouts that eliminate travel waste and maximize space.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Haphazard historical expansion creates crisscrossing material flows, long travel distances, congested aisles, and wasted floor space.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Map existing material travel routes using spaghetti diagrams and quantitative flow matrices.
- 2Step 2: Analyze machine footprint, utility requirements, and safety clearances.
- 3Step 3: Design cellular and unidirectional flow layouts prioritizing product families.
- 4Step 4: Simulate material handling logistics and buffer allocations.
- 5Step 5: Execute phased machine relocation with minimal production downtime.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 35% reduction in material handling and operator movement distance
- 25% floor space freed up for future expansion
- Compressed overall manufacturing lead times
Methodologies Used
Production Planning
Synchronize demand with shopfloor scheduling to eliminate inventory build-up and missed shipments.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Uncoordinated scheduling, frequent plan changes, and push production lead to excessive WIP, stockouts of critical parts, and late customer deliveries.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Analyze demand variability and establish product categorization (ABC/XYZ analysis).
- 2Step 2: Implement Drum-Buffer-Rope or Kanban demand-pull scheduling mechanisms.
- 3Step 3: Design visual production boards and daily scheduling update routines.
- 4Step 4: Align raw material procurement with finite shopfloor capacity schedules.
- 5Step 5: Train planning teams on dynamic leveling (Heijunka) techniques.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 30% reduction in Work-In-Progress (WIP) inventory
- 98%+ On-Time In-Full (OTIF) delivery compliance
- Elimination of rush orders and schedule chaos
Methodologies Used
Capacity Improvement
Unlock hidden plant capacity and expand output without expensive machinery Capex.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Manufacturers believe their plant is running at max capacity and plan major capital expenditure, unaware that 20-35% hidden capacity is locked in bottlenecks and micro-stoppages.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Perform plant-wide capacity modeling to pinpoint physical constraint stations.
- 2Step 2: Sub-optimize non-bottlenecks to ensure continuous feeding of constraint equipment.
- 3Step 3: Eliminate constraint downtime using targeted TPM and quick setup methods.
- 4Step 4: Balance upstream and downstream process speeds with constraint pace.
- 5Step 5: Establish constraint buffer management and real-time output monitoring.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 20-35% output capacity expansion on existing equipment
- Capex deferral or complete avoidance
- Reduced unit production cost
Methodologies Used
Line Balancing
Distribute work content evenly across assembly lines to eliminate idle time and bottlenecks.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Unbalanced work allocation causes line operators to wait on slow stations while others are overworked, resulting in line starvation and low headcount efficiency.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Break down assembly tasks into element work content times.
- 2Step 2: Determine Takt time based on customer demand rates.
- 3Step 3: Reallocate work elements to achieve smooth pitch and minimal balance delay.
- 4Step 4: Design single-operator multi-station work patterns where suitable.
- 5Step 5: Validate line balance with trial runs and standard work sheet documentation.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 35% Manpower Optimisation
- Smooth, continuous line output at Takt time
- Elimination of operator waiting time and idle fatigue
Methodologies Used
OEE Improvement
Maximize equipment availability, performance rate, and quality output on critical assets.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Low equipment availability due to breakdowns, minor stoppages, speed losses, and quality rejects keeps OEE trapped between 40-60%.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Install standardized OEE data capture and loss categorization framework.
- 2Step 2: Conduct 6 Big Losses analysis to pinpoint major downtime contributors.
- 3Step 3: Deploy Autonomous Maintenance (AM) and Planned Maintenance (PM) pillars.
- 4Step 4: Execute SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) setup time reduction projects.
- 5Step 5: Institutionalize Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and 5-Why problem solving.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 18% OEE Improvement across key asset groups
- 38% Changeover Reduction (setup time)
- Significant decrease in unpredicted equipment breakdowns
Methodologies Used
Low Cost Automation
Deploy smart Karakuri mechanisms, Poka-Yoke, and affordable devices to boost quality and speed.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Manual tasks introduce human error, fatigue, and speed limits, while fully automated high-tech solutions require cost-prohibitive investments.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Identify repetitive manual work, part loading/unloading, and error-prone inspection steps.
- 2Step 2: Design mechanical gravity-fed Karakuri kaizen mechanisms for material handling.
- 3Step 3: Implement sensor-based Poka-Yoke (error-proofing) devices at critical quality check points.
- 4Step 4: Integrate simple pneumatic or mechanical actuators to assist heavy manual lifting.
- 5Step 5: Test, refine, and document standardized operation for automated stations.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- Zero-defect quality assurance through Poka-Yoke error-proofing
- 15-25% productivity gain on manual workstations
- Minimal investment with rapid ROI under 6 months
Methodologies Used
Digitalization & Automation
Deploy smart digital dashboards, IoT tracking, and low-cost automation to digitize shopfloor operations.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Paper-based shopfloor logs, manual data entry delays, and lack of real-time visibility into machine downtime, scrap, and line output.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Install digital shopfloor tracking & real-time visual OEE dashboards.
- 2Step 2: Deploy Low Cost Automation (LCIA) and Poka-Yoke error-proofing sensors.
- 3Step 3: Automate daily production reporting and downtime categorization.
- 4Step 4: Connect critical machines for live cycle time and breakdown monitoring.
- 5Step 5: Train supervisors on real-time digital management operating cadences.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- Real-time shopfloor visibility & automated downtime tracking
- Zero-defect quality assurance through automated Poka-Yoke sensors
- Elimination of manual paper log sheets and reporting lag
Methodologies Used
Material Flow
Streamline raw material, WIP, and finished goods movement from dock to dispatch.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Chaotic material handling, double-handling of parts, misplaced inventory, and delayed line feeding disrupt production schedules and inflate logistics costs.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Analyze material movement paths, lot sizes, and handling equipment utilization.
- 2Step 2: Design Mizusumashi (water-spider) timed material supply routes to workstations.
- 3Step 3: Establish supermarket storage zones with min-max inventory controls.
- 4Step 4: Implement Kanban signaling and FIFO (First-In, First-Out) material flow.
- 5Step 5: Standardize container sizes, kit packaging, and visual material status.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 30% Lead Time Reduction
- Elimination of shopfloor line starvation due to part shortages
- 50% reduction in material double-handling
Methodologies Used
Cost Reduction
Identify and eliminate structural manufacturing costs without compromising product quality.
Problem / Floor Challenge
Rising raw material prices, labor costs, and high scrap rates squeeze profit margins, making cost reduction a strategic necessity for manufacturing plants.
Our Implementation Approach
- 1Step 1: Conduct cost-driver analysis across conversion, labor, energy, and scrap categories.
- 2Step 2: Map energy consumption baselines and identify power waste in utilities.
- 3Step 3: Execute yield optimization projects to minimize scrap and raw material loss.
- 4Step 4: Optimize manpower deployment and reduce overtime reliance.
- 5Step 5: Establish plant cost-tracking dashboards and continuous savings pipeline.
Typical Operational Outcomes
- 10-20% reduction in unit conversion cost
- Significant scrap and material yield improvement
- Direct margin expansion for manufacturing operations
Methodologies Used
Ready to Streamline Your Manufacturing Operations?
Book a manufacturing assessment with our consultants to evaluate capacity constraints and line efficiency potential.
